-
8.0
80450
8.0 |
Mojo
The bulk of In Dream is much darker, but no less alluring. Print edition only
-
8.0
80530
8.0 |
Evening Standard
Best comes last with the sprawling, eight-minute closer Marching Orders, which climaxes with Editors’ most giant chorus yet
Read Review
-
8.0
80603
8.0 |
All Music
Although In Dream is neither a dance record, nor a cerebral art-rock album, by borrowing elements from both, the Editors have crafted something grandiose and utterly transfixing
Read Review
-
8.0
80616
8.0 |
musicOMH
Those looking for the band that first appeared in 2002 will be disappointed – the traces are almost completely gone, so it’s time to accept and embrace the new Editors
Read Review
-
7.0
80674
7.0 |
The Line Of Best Fit
In Dreams is equal parts agony and ecstasy - some dreams you hate to leave, while some just feel inescapable
Read Review
-
7.0
81041
7.0 |
The Digital Fix
In Dream successfully melds the two sides of the band into one listenable whole
Read Review
-
7.0
81110
7.0 |
Gig Soup
There are times on the record where it feels like the band has tried a little bit too hard to create something hit worthy
Read Review
-
7.0
80445
7.0 |
Drowned In Sound
In spite of In Dream’s polite frills, big crowdpleasers, and abstract ideals, Editors still hold fast to a sense of self that throbs harder than ever
Read Review
-
7.0
80448
7.0 |
The Music
Seemingly carrying on Ian Curtis' alleged passion for Kraftwerk, In Dream is perhaps the album he may well have made had he lived to a third record
Read Review
-
6.0
80446
6.0 |
The Skinny
In Dream's high spots are surprising and intriguing
Read Review
-
6.0
80447
6.0 |
State
As things stand In Dream, particularly at its sinewy, Violator-esque peak, is certainly an upgrade on the band’s last outing
Read Review
-
6.0
80502
6.0 |
DIY
When it works, it does so spectacularly
Read Review
-
6.0
80594
6.0 |
NME
Editors sound like a band in need of precisely what their name advertises
Read Review
-
5.8
80682
5.8 |
Sputnik Music (staff)
Unfortunately, it’s an LP which simply lacks reward… Both for listeners and, ultimately, the band
Read Review
-
5.0
80580
5.0 |
Uncut
Hard, and not necessarily rewarding work. Print edition only
-
4.0
80481
4.0 |
The Irish Times
Overlong, often turgid and pointlessly decadent record
Read Review
-
4.0
80449
4.0 |
Q
The result is confusion of what the band really wishes to be. Print edition only
-